Decoupling-Analysis of Ukraine's Economy Regurdingits Sustainable Development

Authors

  • S.V. Ivanov Prydniprovska State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture
  • O.B. Vatchenko University of Customs and Finance
  • K.O. Svystun University of Customs and Finance
  • B.S. Vatchenko University of Customs and Finance
  • H.V. Razumova Prydniprovska State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/scine16.03.003

Keywords:

decoupling, environment pressure, overcoupling, resource use, sustainable development

Abstract

Introduction. Timely decoupling analysis of economic growth, environment pressure, and resource consumption in the country enables determining whether it is actually moving towards sustainable development, and how modern and efficient the methods of economic and environment management are in Ukraine.
Problem Statement. The existing decoupling studies in Ukraine don’t take into account the impact of economic development on the environment and the resources consumption.
Purpose. To make decoupling analysis of Ukraine’s economy by the factors of environment pressure and resources consumption in dynamics for 2013-2017.
Materials and Methods. The dialectical method of scientific knowledge, as well as observation, comparison, analytical, and statistical analyses have been used.
Results. The study of decoupling factors by the environmental pressures and resource consumption has revealed the absence of a relative decoupling effect in 2013-2017 at the national level, as decoupling factors were unstable and negative in some years. The analysis of the decoupling indices on environmental pressures in the Ukrainian economy has shown that there was a predominantly recessive dependence between economic development and pollution factors in 2013-2015. A negative expansive decoupling was recorded in 2017 between the GDP growth and the rate of unregulated waste water discharge into surface water bodies and the generation of waste of IV hazard class. In 2017, an expansive relation was recorded between GDP growth and aggregate environmental pressure. Also, there was a negative decoupling in the economy of Ukraine between economic development and consumption of fuel resources from wood (overcoupling).
Conclusions. The absence of relative decoupling effect in the general dynamics in 2013-2017 by the factors of environment pressure and resource consumption testifies to the existence of significant problems in Ukraine in terms of achieving sustainable development and the necessity of decoupling tool application while forming strategic plans.

References

Indicators to Measure Decoupling of Environmental Pressure from Economic Growth. (2002). Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. URL: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?doclangu...(2002)1/final (Last accessed: 30.03.2019).

Vehmas, J., Malaska, P., Luukanen, J., Kaivo-oja, J., Hietanen, O., Vinnary M., and Ilvonen J. Europe in the global battle of sustainability: rebound strikes back? Advanced Sustainability Analysis. Turku School of Economics and Business Administration. Series Discussion and Working Papers. Turku, Finland. 2003. V. 7.

Tapio, P. (2005). Towards a theory of decoupling: degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transport Policy, V. 12.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.001

Daly, Herman E. (1991). Steady-state economics: Second edition with new essays. Island Press, Washington, DC.

Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet. UK: Earthscan.

URL: http://archive.ipu.org/splz-e/unga13/prosperity.pdf (Last accessed: 30.03.2019).

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849774338

von Weizsäcker, E. U., de Larderel, J. A., Hargroves, K., Hudson, C., Smith, M. H., Rodrigues, M. A. E., …, and Sparks, D. Decoupling 2: technologies, opportunities and policy options. A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. 2014.

URL: http://www.resourcepanel.org/sites/default/files/documents/document/medi.

(дата звернення: 30.03.2019). (Last accessed: 30.03.2019).

Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E. U., Ren, Y., Morigychi, Y., Crane, W., …, and Sewerin, S. (2011). Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth. A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. United Nations Environment Programme.

URL: https://www.resourcepanel.org/file/400/download?token=E0TEjf3z

(Last accessed: 30.03.2019).

Schandl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., West, J., Giljum, S., Dittrich, M., Eisenmenger, N., …, and Fishman, T. Global material flows and resource productivity. An assessment Report for the UNEP International Resource Panel (2016). United Nations Environment Programme.

URL: www.resourcepanel.org/file/423/download?token=Av9xJsGS

(Last accessed: 30.03.2019).

Danylyshyn, B. M., and Veklych, O. O. (2008). Decoupling effect as a factor of interrelation between economic growth and the pressure on environment. Visnyk of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 5, 12–18 [in Ukrainian].

Kubatko, O. V. (2009). Stimulating the development of the national economy in the context of the crisis, taking into account the environmental component. Economics: Problems of Theory and Practice, 252(3), 727–739. Dnipropetrovsk: DSU.

URL: https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/2864/1/Kubatko.pdf

(Last accessed: 30.03.2019) [in Ukrainian].

Tur, О. M. (2012). Economic substantiation of the strategy of ecologically-oriented development of the national economy. (PhD) (Econom.). Sumy [in Ukrainian].

Bobrovska, N. V., and Kostyrko, A. G. (2016). Environmental consciousness in use of natural resources. Scientific Visnyk of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine. Series: Economy, agrarian management, business, 249, 37–44.

URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/nvnau_econ_2016_249_6

(Last accessed: 30.03.2019) [in Ukrainian].

Gorsky, А. (2014). The decoupling effect as a criterion of ecological-oriented economic development of Ukraine. The Economics of Environmental Management and Environmental Protection, 8, 23–26.

URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/epod_2014_2014_8 (Last accessed: 30.03.2019) [inUkrainian].

Sotnyk, I. M., and Kulyk, L. A. (2014). Decouling analysis of economic growth and environmental impact in the regions of Ukraine. Economic Annals-XXI, 7–8, 60–64.

URL: http://soskin.info/userfiles/file/2014/7-8_2014/7-8_2/Sotnyk_Kulyk.pdf

(Last accessed: 30.03.2019) [in Ukrainian].

Resource efficient & cleaner production policy: fostering green industry in Ukraine. Background report from Vienna University of Economics and Business. United Nations Industrial Development Organization.

URL: http://www.recpc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/background_paper_all.pdf

(Last accessed: 30.03.2019) [in Ukrainian].

Emissions of carbon dioxide from stationary sources of pollution in regions of Ukraine.

URL: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2018/sg/word/vdv_u.zip

(Last accessed: 30.03.2019) [in Ukrainian].

Statistical yearbooks of Ukraine since 2013 to 2017.

URL: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ (Last accessed: 30.03.2019) [in Ukrainian].

Gross Domestic Product of Ukraine in 1990-2007.

URL: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2005/vvp/vvp_ric/vvp_u.htm

​(Last accessed: 30.03.2019) [in Ukrainian].

Downloads

Published

2024-09-10

How to Cite

Ivanov, S., Vatchenko, O., Svystun, K., Vatchenko, B., & Razumova, H. (2024). Decoupling-Analysis of Ukraine’s Economy Regurdingits Sustainable Development. Science and Innovation, 16(3), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine16.03.003

Issue

Section

General Problems of Modern Research and Innovation Policy