Chemical Binding of Sulfur Dioxide in a Bubbling Reactor with the Use of Urea

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/scine19.03.071

Keywords:

sulfur dioxide, bubbling chemical reactor, urea solution

Abstract

Introduction. Integration of Ukraine into the European Union requires a significant reduction in pollutant emissions from industrial enterprises. Special attention is paid to the entry of suspended solid particles, nitrogen oxides, carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide from thermal power plants into the atmosphere.
Problem Statement. Sulfur dioxide is one of the main pollutants of the environment. Its entry into the atmospheric air leads to the formation of acid rain, which negatively affects people, soil, plants, and ground structures.
Purpose. To study the influence of the initial mass content of urea in an aqueous solution and its temperature on the efficiency of the process of chemical binding of sulfur dioxide.
Material and Methods. Several scholarly research publications dealing with the removal of sulfur oxides from waste gases of thermal power plants by various methods and technologies with the use of urea have been considered. The research is based on a mathematical model of a bubbling type chemical reactor.
Results. A series of numerical experiments on a chemical reactor where urea is used as a source of ammonia to bind sulfur dioxide in solution has been conducted. The calculations have made it possible to determine the optimal temperature of the solution at a certain urea content. The temperature should be equal to approximately 57 °C, at an initial urea content of 1%, 40 °C, at a content of 5%, and 35 °C, at 10%. Under such conditions, the efficiency of the process of chemical binding of sulfur dioxide in the solution is close to 100%.
Conclusions. The analysis of the results of mathematical modeling of processes in a chemical reactor has shown that for the pair of parameters “temperature-urea content” there are values at which the efficiency of the binding process reaches almost 100%. To control the efficiency, it is advisable to use the potential of hydrogen of the solution at a level of 7 ± 0.5. The lower values of the potential of hydrogen indicate a drop in the process efficiency, while the higher values indicate an increase in the concentration of ammonia in the treated gases at the reactor outlet.

References

About modification of the order of the Ministry of Environment from 22.10.2008 No. 541: Order of the Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources of Ukraine from 16.02.2018 No. 62. [in Ukrainian]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0290-18#n2 (Last accessed: 14.09.2022).

EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual. EPA/452/B-02-001: Section 4 — NOx Controls. Chapter 2 — Selective Catalytic Reduction. Official site. 2016. P. 2—108. URL: https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/ecas/docs/SCRCostManualchapter7th Edition_2016.pdf (Last accessed: 14.09.2022).

EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual. EPA/452/B-02-001: Section 4 — NOx Controls. Chapter 1 — Selective Noncatalytic Reduction. Official site. 2016. P. 1—70. URL: https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/ecas/docs/SNCRCostManualchapter7thEdition2016.pdf (Last accessed: 14.09.2022).

Fang, P., Cen, Ch., Tang, Zh., Zhong, P., Chen, D., Chen, Zh. (2011). Simultaneous Removal of SO2 and NOX by Wet Scrubbing Using Urea Solution. Chemical Engineering Journal, 168, 52—59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.12.030

Wang, J., Zhang, S., Liu, H., Li, L. (2012). Flue Gas Simultaneous Desulfurization and Denitrification with Urea in Spouted Bed. Advanced Materials Research, 550—553, 2151—2154. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.550-553.2151 https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.550-553.2151

Zhu, F., Gao, J., Chen, X., Tong, M., Zhou, Ya., Lu, J. (2015). Hydrolysis of Urea for Ammonia-Based Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 54(37), 9072—9080. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02041

Wang, D., Dong, N., Niu, Ya., Hui, Sh. (2019). A Review of Urea Pyrolysis to Produce NH3 Used for NOX Removal. Journal of Chemistry. 2019, Article ID 6853638. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6853638

Sahu, J. N., Hussain, S., Meikap, B. C. (2011). Studies on the Hydrolysis of Urea for Production of Ammonia and Modeling for Flow Characterization in Presence of Stirring in a Batch Reactor Using Computational Fluid Dynamics. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 28(6), 1380—1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-010-0524-9

Korchuganova, E. N., Tantsyura, E. V., Abuzarova, K. R., Prigorodov, P. V. (2015). Study of the urea hydrolysis kinetics in the precipitation conditions of hydroxides and metal salts. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5/6(77), 53—57. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.51057 [in Russian].

Mahalik, K., Sahu, J. N., Patwardhan, A. V., Meikap, B. C. (2010). Kinetic Studies on Hydrolysis of Urea in a Semi-Batch Reactor at Atmospheric Pressure for Safe Use of Ammonia in a Power Plant for Flue Gas Conditioning. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 175(1—3), 629—637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.053

Aoki, H., Fujiwara, T., Morozumi, Y., Takatoshi, M. (1999, July) Measurement of urea thermal decomposition reaction rate for NO selective non-catalytic reduction. Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Technologies and Combustion for a Clean Environment (12—15 July 1999, Lisbon, Portugal), 115—118.

Kolomiiets, O. M. (2012). Wet Bubbling FGD Chemical Reactor: Mathematical model. Energy and Electrification, 4, 12—18 [in Ukrainian].

Downloads

Published

2023-06-08

How to Cite

KOLOMIIETS, O. (2023). Chemical Binding of Sulfur Dioxide in a Bubbling Reactor with the Use of Urea. Science and Innovation, 19(3), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine19.03.071

Issue

Section

Scientific and Technical Innovation Projects of the National Academy of Sciences