EFFECT OF EXOGENOUS BRASSINOSTEROIDS ON RESISTANCE OF ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA TO BACTERIAL INFECTION BY PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/dopovidi2026.04.012

Keywords:

brassinosteroids, 24-epibrassinolide, BRI1 receptor, Arabidopsis thaliana, Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000, pathogens, phytohormones, plant immunity

Abstract

The effects of exogenous brassinosteroids—24-epibrassinolide and 24-epicastasterone—as well as a specific inhibitor of their biosynthesis, brassinazole, on the resistance of Arabidopsis thaliana plants to infection by the hemibiotrophic bacterial phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pto DC3000) was comprehensively investigated. The study analyzed the progression of an intracellular bacterial infection in wild-type plants (ecotype Columbia-0) and in the bri1-6 mutant line, which is insensitive to brassinosteroids, using the flood inoculation method for in vitro infection of plants. The bacterial load within leaf tissues was quantified on the third day after inoculation by counting colony-forming units (CFU) per gram of fresh weight following surface sterilization. It was found that inhibition of endogenous brassinosteroids biosynthesis by brassinazole severely reduces the basal immunity of wild-type plants. The application of exogenous 24-epibrassinolide completely counteracts the effects of brassinazole that cause morphological dwarfism. When applied separately, exogenous 24-epibrassinolide resulted in a statistically significant reduction in pathogen accumulation only at the highest concentration tested — 100 nM. The protective effectiveness of 24-epicastasterone, a biosynthetic precursor with lower biological activity, strongly depended on the mode of application. Its addition to the growth medium alone conferred resistance only at higher concentrations of 100 nM and 1 μM, whereas a supplemental foliar spraying treatment performed two days prior to inoculation significantly enhanced plant resistance already at a lower concentration of 10 nM. Crucially, all protective and regulatory effects of exogenous brassinosteroids were observed only in the presence of a functional BRI1 receptor. This was confirmed by the complete resistance of bri1-6 plants to any chemical stress and their characteristically low level of constitutive immunity. These results highlight the important role of brassinosteroid homeostasis and BRI1-mediated signaling in balancing growth-defense trade-off.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Blanco-Touriñán, N., Rana, S., Nolan, T. M., Li, K., Vukašinović, N., Hsu, C.-W., Russinova, E., & Hardtke, C. S. (2024). The brassinosteroid receptor gene BRI1 safeguards cell-autonomous brassinosteroid signaling across tissues. Sci. Adv., 10, No. 39, eadq3352. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adq3352

Caño-Delgado, A., Yin, Y., Yu, C., Vafeados, D., Mora-García, S., Cheng, J.-C., Nam, K. H., Li, J., & Chory, J. (2004). BRL1 and BRL3 are novel brassinosteroid receptors that function in vascular differentiation in Arabidopsis. Development, 131, No. 21, pp. 5341–5351. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01403

Hothorn, M., Belkhadir, Y., Dreux, M., Dabi, T., Noel, J. P., Wilson, I. A., & Chory, J. (2011). Structural basis of steroid hormone perception by the receptor kinase BRI1. Nature, 474, No. 7352, pp. 467–471. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10153

Noguchi, T., Fujioka, S., Choe, S., Takatsuto, S., Yoshida, S., Yuan, H., Feldmann, K. A., & Tax, F. E. (1999). Brassinosteroid-insensitive dwarf mutants of Arabidopsis accumulate brassinosteroids. Plant Physiol., 121, No. 3, pp. 743–752. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.121.3.743

Nolan, T. M., Vukašinović, N., Liu, D., Russinova, E., & Yin, Y. (2020). Brassinosteroids: Multidimensional regulators of plant growth, development, and stress responses. Plant Cell, 32, No. 2, pp. 295–318. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.19.00335

Gruszka, D., Bajguz, A., Li, Q.-F., Hayat, S., Hansson, M., Wang, X., & Li, J. (2021). Editorial: An update on brassinosteroids: Homeostasis, crosstalk, and adaptation to environmental stress. Front. Plant Sci., 12, 673587. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.673587

Sadura, I., & Janeczko, A. (2022). Brassinosteroids and the tolerance of cereals to low and high temperature stress: Photosynthesis and the physicochemical properties of cell membranes. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23, No. 1, 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010342

Chen, Z., Wang, Z., Yang, Y., Li, M., & Xu, B. (2018). Abscisic acid and brassinolide combined application synergistically enhances drought tolerance and photosynthesis of tall fescue under water stress. Sci. Hortic., 228, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.10.004

Li, Q., Xu, F., Chen, Z., Teng, Z., Sun, K., Li, X., Yu, J., Zhang, G., Liang, Y., Huang, X., Du, L., Qian, Y., Wang, Y., Chu, C., & Tang, J. (2021). Synergistic interplay of ABA and BR signal in regulating plant growth and adaptation. Nat. Plants, 7, No. 8, pp. 1108–1118. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-021-00959-1

Nakashita, H., Yasuda, M., Nitta, T., Asami, T., Fujioka, S., Arai, Y., Sekimata, K., Takatsuto, S., Yamaguchi, I., & Yoshida, S. (2003). Brassinosteroid functions in a broad range of disease resistance in tobacco and rice. Plant J., 33, No. 5, pp. 887–898. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01675.x

Sahni, S., Prasad, B. D., Liu, Q., Grbic, V., Sharpe, A., Singh, S. P., & Krishna, P. (2016). Overexpression of the brassinosteroid biosynthetic gene DWF4 in Brassica napus simultaneously increases seed yield and stress tolerance. Sci. Rep., 6, 28298. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28298

Asami, T., Min, Y. K., Nagata, N., Yamagishi, K., Takatsuto, S., Fujioka, S., Murofushi, N., Yamaguchi, I., & Yoshida, S. (2000). Characterization of brassinazole, a triazole-type brassinosteroid biosynthesis inhibitor. Plant Physiol., 123, No. 1, pp. 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.123.1.93

Xiao, S., Hu, Q., Zhang, X., Si, H., Liu, S., Chen, L., Chen, K., Berne, S., Yuan, D., Lindsey, K., Zhang, X., & Zhu, L. (2021). Orchestration of plant development and defense by indirect crosstalk of salicylic acid and brassinosteroid signaling via transcription factor GhTINY2. J. Exp. Bot., 72, No. 13, pp. 4721–4743. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab186

Liao, K., Peng, Y.-J., Yuan, L.-B., Dai, Y.-S., Chen, Q.-F., Yu, L.-J., Bai, M.-Y., Zhang, W.-Q., Xie, L.-J., & Xiao, S. (2020). Brassinosteroids antagonize jasmonate-activated plant defense responses through BRI1-EMS-SUPPRESSOR1 (BES1). Plant Physiol., 182, No. 2, pp. 1066–1082. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.19.01220

Park, C.-H., Park, Y. J., Youn, J.-H., Roh, J., & Kim, S.-K. (2023). Brassinosteroids and salicylic acid mutually enhance endogenous content and signaling to show a synergistic effect on pathogen resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Plant Biol., 66, No. 2, pp. 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-023-09390-9

Dobrev, P. I., & Vankova, R. (2012). Quantification of abscisic acid, cytokinin, and auxin content in salt-stressed plant tissues. In: Plant Salt Tolerance: Methods and Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 913 (pp. 251–261). Totowa, N. J.: Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-986-0_17

Ishiga, Y., Ishiga, T., Uppalapati, S. R., & Mysore, K. S. (2011). Arabidopsis seedling flood-inoculation technique: A rapid and reliable assay for studying plant-bacterial interactions. Plant Methods, 7, 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-7-32

Ishiga, Y., Ishiga, T., Ichinose, Y., & Mysore, K. S. (2017). Pseudomonas syringae flood-inoculation method in Arabidopsis. Bio-Protocol, 7, No. 2, e2106. https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.2106

Xiong, J., Wan, X., Ran, M., Xu, X., Chen, L., & Yang, F. (2022). Brassinosteroids positively regulate plant immunity via BRI1-EMS-SUPPRESSOR 1-mediated GLUCAN SYNTHASE-LIKE 8 transcription. Front. Plant Sci., 13, 854899. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.854899

Published

31.08.2026

How to Cite

Bukhonska, Y., Kolesnikov, Y., Kretynin, S., & Derevyanchuk, M. (2026). EFFECT OF EXOGENOUS BRASSINOSTEROIDS ON RESISTANCE OF ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA TO BACTERIAL INFECTION BY PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE. Reports of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, (4), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.15407/dopovidi2026.04.012