A NEW METHOD OF DETERMINING THE HARDWARE FUNCTION IN X-RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/dopovidi2023.05.047

Keywords:

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, energy analyzer, hardware function, resolution, amplitude distribution of pulses

Abstract

A new method for instrumentally determining the hardware function in X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy has been developed. This study demonstrates, for the first time, the feasibility of obtaining the hardware function of the spectrometer by supplementing the standard XPS output data with additional information in the form of amplitude distributions of single-electron pulses for each point of the spectrum. The method eliminates the need for subjective criteria in selecting parameters of the XPS spectrum, as encountered in the deconvolution method, for example. The algorithm of the method is based on the analysis of the amplitude distribution function of pulses at each spectrum point using the signal-to-noise ratio criterion. It is shown that the application of this method enables a reduction in the line width of the Cu2p3/2 level from 1.2 eV to 1.0 eV, reduces the Lorentzian contribution, and allows for separation of the feature at the spectrum maximum. This method can be applied to address the challenge of signal selection from noise, as well as in various areas of spectroscopy where the counting of single-electron pulses is utilized, particularly in corpuscular spectroscopy, such as electron and ion spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and raster electron microscopy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gloter, A., Douiri, A., Tencé, M. & Colliex, C. (2003). Improving energy resolution of EELS spectra: an alternative to the monochromator solution. Ultramicroscopy, 96, Iss. 3-4, , pp. 385-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3991(03)00103-7

Powell, C. J. (2016). Growth of surface analysis and the development of databases and modeling software for auger-electron spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Microscopy Today, 24, Iss. 2, pp. 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1551929516000080

Chevalier, R. B. & Dwyer, J. R. (2019). An open source, iterative dual-tree wavelet background subtraction method extended from automated diffraction pattern analysis to optical spectroscopy. Appl. Spectrosc., 73, Iss. 12, pp. 1370-1379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003702819871330

Matsumura, T., Nagamura, N., Akaho, S., Nagata, K. & Ando, Y. (2023). High-throughput XPS spectrum modeling with autonomous background subtraction for 3d5/2 peak mapping of SnS. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. Methods, 3, Iss.1. https://doi.org/10.1080/27660400.2022.2159753

Hajati, S., Tougaard, S., Walton, J. & Fairley, N. (2008). Noise reduction procedures applied to XPS imaging of depth distribution of atoms on the nanoscale. Surf. Sci., 602, Iss. 18, pp.3064-3070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. susc.2008.08.005

Wells, J. W. & Birkinshaw, K. (2006). A matrix approach to resolution enhancement of XPS spectra by a modified maximum entropy method. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 152, Iss. 1-2, pp. 37-43. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.elspec.2006.03.003

Vasquez, R.P., Klein, J.D., Barton, J.J. & Grunthaner, F.J. (1981). Application of maximum-entropy spectral estimation to deconvolution of XPS data. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 23, No. 1, pp. 63-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0368-2048(81)85037-2

Briggs, D. & Seach, M. P. (Eds.). (1983). Practical surface analysis by auger and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Chichester; New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.740060611

Crist, B. V. (1999). Handbook of monochromatic XPS spectra. Mountain View: XPS International.

Published

22.11.2023

How to Cite

Korduban, O., Medvedskij, M., & Korduban, D. (2023). A NEW METHOD OF DETERMINING THE HARDWARE FUNCTION IN X-RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY. Reports of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, (5), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.15407/dopovidi2023.05.047