DETERMINATION OF IVERMECTIN ALLOSTERIC INTERACTION PATTERNS WITH GLUTAMATE-GATED CHLORIDE CHANNEL OF CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/dopovidi2023.04.076Keywords:
ivermectin, Caenorhabditis elegans, glutamate-gated chloride channels, in silico modellingAbstract
This study aimed to determine the structural patterns of ivermectin, a compound with anthelmintic and insecticidal activity, in its allosteric interactions with the α-homopentameric glutamate-gated chloride channel of Caenorhabditis elegans. The findings reveal that the binding site primarily consists of hydrophobic, aliphatic, polar, and small residues. The macrocyclic lactone ring exhibits a high affinity for the V—I—G—A—M pattern, involving residues V278, I280, G281, A282, and M284 of the M3 subunit of the (+) configuration, as well as the I—V—D—L pattern, encompassing residues I273 of the M2-M3 region, D277, V278 of the M3 subunit of the (+) configuration, and L218 of the M1 subunit (—) configuration. The spiroketal group interacts with the M—T—F— C—M—I pattern, comprising residues M284, T285, and F288 of the M3 subunit of the (+) configuration, and C225, M226, and I229 of the M1 subunit (—) configuration. Regarding the benzofuran group, it predominantly interacts quantitatively with small and polar residues. However, it exhibits fewer contacts with hydrophobic residues compared to the other groups. This is evident in the T—A—S—N—D—I—L—Q—I—P pattern, involving residues T257, A258, S260, N264, D277, and I280 of the M3 subunit of the (+) configuration, and L218, Q219, I222, and P223 of the M1 subunit (—) configuration. The obtained data can be utilized to identify new molecular targets for ivermectin and facilitate the development of new ligands with high affinity for the identified ivermectin targets in various eukaryotic organisms.
Downloads
References
Mittal, N. & Mittal, R. (2021). Repurposing old molecules for new indications: defining pillars of success from lessons in the past. Eur. J. Pharmacol., 912, 174569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.174569
Boudwin, R., Magarey, R. & Jess, L. (2022). Integrated pest management data for regulation, research, and education: crop profiles and pest management strategic plans. J. Integr. Pest Manag., 13, No. 1, 13. https://doi. org/10.1093/jipm/pmac011
Habschied, K., Krstanović, V., Zdunić, Z., Babić, J., Mastanjević, K. & Šarić, G. K. (2021). Mycotoxins biocontrol methods for healthier crops and stored products. J. Fungi, 7, No. 5, 348. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7050348
Martin, R. J., Robertson, A. P. & Choudhary, S. (2021). Ivermectin: an anthelmintic, an insecticide, and much more. Trends Parasitol., 37, No. 1, pp. 48-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2020.10.005
Ashraf, S., Beech, R. N., Hancock, M. A. & Prichard, R. K. (2015). Ivermectin binds to Haemonchus contortus tubulins and promotes stability of microtubules. Int. J. Parasitol., 45, No. 9—10, pp. 647-654. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2015.03.010
Salentin, S., Haupt, V. J., Daminelli, S. & Schroeder, M. (2014). Polypharmacology rescored: protein–ligand interaction profiles for remote binding site similarity assessment. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol., 116, No. 2-3, pp. 174-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2014.05.006
Hibbs, R. E. & Gouaux, E. (2011). Principles of activation and permeation in an anion-selective Cys-loop receptor. Nature, 474, No. 7349, pp. 54-60. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10139
Volkamer, A., Griewel, A., Grombacher, T. & Rarey, M. (2010). Analyzing the topology of active sites: on the prediction of pockets and subpockets. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 50, No. 11, pp. 2041-2052. https://doi.org/10.1021/ ci100241y
Valdar, W. S. J. (2001). Scoring residue conservation. Proteins, 48, No. 2, pp. 227-241. https://doi.org/10.1002/ prot.10146
Schneider, N., Lange, G., Hindle, S., Klein, R. & Rarey, M. (2013). A consistent description of HYdrogen bond and DEhydration energies in protein–ligand complexes: methods behind the HYDE scoring function. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 27, No. 1, pp. 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-012-9626-2
Korb, O., Stützle, T. & Exner, T. E. (2009). Empirical scoring functions for advanced protein-ligand docking with PLANTS. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 49, No. 1, pp. 84-96. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci800298z
Mooij, W. T. M. & Verdonk, M. L. (2005). General and targeted statistical potentials for protein–ligand interactions. Proteins, 61, No. 2, pp. 272-287. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.20588
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Reports of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.