Sustainable Development Goals: a roadmap for a sustainable existence of society in the biosphere or a global capitalism trap?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2025.09.013Keywords:
sustainable development, sustainability, economic growth, transformations, sustainable development goals, Ukraine.Abstract
The article tries to renew the discussion on revising the understanding of sustainable development in the Anthropocene based on the objective existence of the Planetary Boundaries. An analysis of the effectiveness of the Sustainable Development Goals 2030 as of 2025 has shown that the basic structure of sustainable development and the current global economic system on which they are based are unable to ensure their achievement in accordance with their distinguished parameters. The systemic dimensions and geographical scales of transformations of social development on the way to balance and coherence of the existence of society and economy within the limited Earth global ecosystem are outlined.
Cite this article:
Dronova O.L. Sustainable Development Goals: a roadmap for a sustainable existence of society in the biosphere or a global capitalism trap? Visn. Nac. Akad. Nauk Ukr. 2025. (9): 13—28. https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2025.09.013
References
Griggs D., Stafford-Smith M., Gaffney O., Rockström J., Öhman M.C., Shyamsundar P., Steffen W., Glaser G., Kanie N., Noble I. Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature. 2013. 495(7441): 305—307. https://doi.org/10.1038/495305a
Turnock D. East Central Europe and the Former Soviet Union: Environment and Society. London: Taylor & Francis, 2024. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003571926
Steffen W., Richardson K., Rockström J., Schellnhuber H.J., Dube O.P., Dutreuil S., Lenton T.M., Lubchenco J. The emergence and evolution of Earth System Science. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 2020. 1(1): 54—63. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-019-0005-6
Richardson K., Steffen W., Lucht W. et al. Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Science Advances. 2023. 9(37): eadh2458. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458
Lisovsky S.A. Osnovy staloho (zbalansovanoho) ekonomichnoho, sotsialnoho, ekolohichnoho rozvytku [Fundamentals of sustainable economic, social, and ecological development]. Zhytomyr, 2007 [in Ukrainian].
Lisovsky S.A. Pryroda i suspilstvo: balans interesiv na terenakh Ukrainy [Nature and society: balance of interests in Ukraine]. Kyiv, 2009 [in Ukrainian].
Naukovi zasady rozrobky stratehii staloho rozvytku Ukrainy [Scientific principles of developing a sustainable development strategy for Ukraine]. Odesa, 2012 [in Ukrainian].
Rudenko L.G. (ed.) Status of implementation of the provisions of “Agenda for the XXI Century” in Ukraine (2002—2012). Kyiv, Akademperiodyka, 2014 [in Ukrainian].
Rudenko L.G., Lisovsky S.A. Development of geographical principles for the balanced development of regions of Ukraine as a priority area of activity of the Institute of Geography of the NAS of Ukraine. In: Heohrafiia, kartohrafiia, heohrafichna osvita: istoriia, metodolohiia, praktyka. Proc. Sci. Conf. Chernivtsi, 2014 [in Ukrainian].
Hrechko T.K., Lisovsky S.A., Romanyuk S.A., Rudenko L.G. Publichne upravlinnia v zabezpechenni staloho (zbalansovanoho) rozvytku [Public administration in ensuring sustainable development]. Kherson, 2015 [in Ukrainian].
Dronova O.L. Zapototskyi S.P. Suchasne pryrodokorystuvannia: suspilno-heohrafichnyi kontekst [Modern nature management: socio-geographical context]. Kyiv: Print-Servis, 2018 [in Ukrainian].
Rockström J., Kotzé L., Milutinović S. et al. The planetary commons: A new paradigm for safeguarding Earth-regulating systems in the Anthropocene. PNAS. 2024. 121(5): e2301531121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2301531121
Bendell J. Replacing sustainable development: Potential frameworks for international cooperation in an era of increasing crises and disasters. Sustainability. 2022. 14(13): 8185. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138185
Eisenmenger N., Pichler M., Krenmayr N., Noll D., Plank B., Schalmann E., Wandl M.-T., Gingrich S. The Sustainable Development Goals prioritize economic growth over sustainable resource use: a critical reflection on the SDGs from a socio-ecological perspective. Sustainability Science. 2020. 15(4): 1101—1110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00813-x
Vandemoortele J. From simple-minded MDGs to muddle-headed SDGs. Development Studies Research. 2018. 5(1): 83—89. https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2018.1479647
Kohatko Yu., Polіakova S. The level of material deprivation in Ukraine: the impact of the economic crisis, COVID-19, and the war. Ekonomika ta Suspilstvo. 2024. 67. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-67-37
Mohajan D., Mohajan H.K. Obesity and its related diseases: a new escalating alarming in global health. Journal of Innovations in Medical Research. 2023. 2(3): 12—23. https://doi.org/10.56397/JIMR/2023.03.04
Ellis E.C., Gauthier N., Goldewijk K.K. People have shaped most of terrestrial nature for at least 12,000 years. PNAS. 2021. 118(17): e2023483118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023483118
Grochová I.L., Litzman M. The efficiency in meeting measurable sustainable development goals. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 2021. 28(8): 709—719. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2021.1882606
Swift A. Political Philosophy: A Beginners’ Guide for Students and Politicians. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001.
Time to revise the sustainable development goals. Nature. 2020. 583(7816): 331—332. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02002-3
Von Weizsäcker E.U., Wijkman A. Come on! Capitalism, Short-termism, Population and the Destruction of the Planet. Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7419-1
Lenzen M., Moran D., Kanemoto K., Foran B., Lobefaro L., Geschke A. International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature. 2012. 486(7401): 109—112. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11145
Capra F. Life, nature and systems. In: LIFE. Transdisciplinary Inquiry. Intellect, 2024. P. 42—61. https://doi.org/10.1386/9781789387926_3
Kates R.W., Travis W.R., Wilbanks T.J. Transformational adaptation when incremental adaptations to climate change are insufficient. PNAS. 2012. 109(19): 7156—7161. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.111552110
Sachs J.D., Schmidt-Traub G., Mazzucato M., Messner D., Nakicenovic N., Rockström J. Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Nature Sustainability. 2019. 2: 805—814. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9
Rockström J., Sachs J.D., Öhman M.C., Schmidt-Traub G. Sustainable development and planetary boundaries. Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 2022.
Díaz S., Pascual U., Stenseke M. et al. Assessing nature's contributions to people. Science. 2018. 359(6373): 270—272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap882
Österblom H., Jouffray J.-B., Folke C., Crona B., Troell M., Merrie A., Rockström J. Transnational corporations as keystone actors in marine ecosystem. PLoS ONE. 2015. 10: e0127533. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127533
Galaz V., Crona B., Dauriach A., Scholtens B., Steffen W. Finance and the Earth system: Exploring the links between financial actors and non-linear changes in the climate system. Global Environmental Change. 2018. 53: 296—302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.008
Folke C., Polasky S., Rockström J. et al. Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere. Ambio. 2021. 50: 834—869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01544-8
Pyrozhkov S.І., Bozhok Ye.V., Khamitov N.V. National resilience of the country: strategy and tactics of anticipation of hybrid threats. Visn. Nac. Akad. Nauk Ukr. 2021. (8): 74—82. https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2021.08.074
Newell P. Towards a more transformative approach to climate finance. Climate Policy. 2025. 25(2): 257—268. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2024.2377730
Rifkin J. How the third industrial revolution will create a green economy. New Perspectives Quarterly. 2016. 33(1): 6. https://doi.org/10.1111/npqu.12017
Bateson G. Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. University of Chicago Press, 2000.
