SOCIAL REALITY IN THE DIGITAL SPACE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2022.01.003Keywords:
digital space; social reality; “slipping reality”; the common; the different; organization of activities; society; disproportions; split; contradictions.Abstract
The article reveals the nature of the transformation of social reality under the influence of the growing and profound use of information and communication technologies, which is based on a number of fundamental challenges that form a deep contradiction between man and his freedoms and society. Mass digitization of the latter allows to develop and bring to universalism the methods of controlling the behavior of the individual, as well as the methods of managing his psychological state. It is shown that the fundamental challenge of personal perception of reality in the digital space will be the “slipping reality”, which leads to a weakening of the preconditions of humanity and the emergence of conditions for human manipulation and choice between freedom and non-freedom (subordination). It is emphasized that algorithmization of decision-making based on the use of large databases will be increasingly used in management practice, for whose processing the so-called “weapon of mathematical destruction” is applied, which allows to lay down and realize the interest of those who collect, process and use them for their own purposes.
It is substantiated that digitalization will preserve in the social space the deepening polarization of countries and populations in terms of income, ability to acquire knowledge, use of digital technologies, lifestyle, communicational abilities, etc., which may split society into those socialized on the basis of knowledge of the “mother tongue”, and those who, thanks to digitalization, have formed a social space with a “slipping reality”. There is a task to invent ways of socialization on the basis of socio-natural ethics in the social reality, which may continue to be deformed in the case of expanding existing practices in the use of digital technologies in society and the economy.
References
Fishman L., Martyanov V., Davydov D. Rent Society: In the Shadow of Labor, Capital and Democracy. Moscow, Publisher of the Higher School of Economics, 2019, available at: www.madipi.ru/texts/show/fishman_l_g_martyanov_v_s_davydov_d_a_rentnoe_obshhestvo_v_teni_truda_kapitala_i_demokratii_m_izddom_vysshej_shkoly_ekonomiki_2019 [in Russian].
Zayko A. Social activity as a sociological category. Yekaterinburg, UrFU, 2013, pp. 656-662, available at: elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/51982/1/klo_2013_082.pdf [in Russian].
Schwab K., Malleret T. COVID-19: The Great Reset. World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland, available at: pravda.red/download/covid-19-velikaya-perezagruzka.pdf [in Russian].
Morrison R. Democracy in the 21st century. The World of Transformations, 2021, No. 3, pp. 143-150 [in Russian].
Parsons T. The Social System. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proyekt, 2002, available at: www.pavroz.ru/files/parsonsosistemah.pdf [in Russian].
Havens J.C. The Fleeting Opportunity to Create our Values by Design. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 2017, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 33-37, available at: ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=7947276
doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2017.2697081
Brada J. Platform companies and the global economy. Expert, 2021, No. 46, p. 9 [in Russian].
Marushevskyi G. Ethics of Sustainable Development. Kyiv, Center for Environmental Education and Information, 2008, available at: necu.org.ua/etyka-zbalansovanogo-rozvytku/ [in Ukrainian].
Heyets V. Socialization and its success in the model of achieving the development of the social world. Economic Theory, 2021, No. 4, pp. 5-40. available at doi.org/10.15407/etet2021.04.005 [in Ukrainian].
doi.org/10.15407/etet2021.04.005
History of Ethical Teachings. A.A. Guseynov (Ed.). Moscow, Gardariki, 2003 [in Russian].
Kostenko N., Ivanov V. Experience of Content Analysis: Models and Practices. Kyiv, Free Press Center, 2003, available at: www.aup.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Dosvid-kontent-analizu.-Modeli-ta-praktiki.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Darwin C. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. Moscow, Kniga po trebovaniyu, 2013 [in Russian].
Berger P., Luckmann T. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Moscow, Medium, 1995 available at: 194.44.152.155/elib/local/r311.pdf [in Russian].
Bauman Z. The Individualized Society. Moscow, Logos, 2005, available at: socioline.ru/files/5/39/bauman_zigmunt_individualizirovannoe_obshchestvo-2005.pdf [in Russian].
Lyotard J.-F. The Postmodern Condition. Moscow, Institute of Experimental Sociology, Saint Petersburg, Aletheia, 1998, available at: www.google.com/url?esrc=s&q=&rct=j&sa=U&url=http://www.phantastike.com/philosophy/sostoyaniye_postmoderna/zip/&ved=2ahUKEwiYzI_N45z1AhVmmIsKHfJcBk8QFnoECAoQAg&usg=AOvVaw3xoqS2Sc-7sWMXlpSGrR9i [in Russian].
Ganichev N., Koshovets O. Forcing the digital economy: How will the structure of digital markets change as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic? Problems of Forecasting, 2021, No. 1, pp. 19-35, available at: ecfor.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/realnoe-vliyanie-pandemii-na-tsifrovye-rynki.pdf [in Russian].
doi.org/10.1134/S1075700721010056
Kai-Fu Lee. We Are Here to Create. Еdge.org, March 26, 2018, available at: www.edge.org/conversation/kai_fu_lee-we-are-here-to-create
Gurova T., Sysoev T. The state that we do not know. Ekspert, 2021, No. 23, pp. 89-96, available at: expert.ru/expert/2021/23/gosudarstvo-kotoroye-my-ne-znayem/ [in Russian].
Dolgin A. Manifesto of the New Economy. The Second Invisible Hand of the Market. Moscow, AST, 2010, available at: 213.230.96.51:8090/files/ebooks/Iqtisodiyot/Dolgin%20A.%20Manifest%20novoj%20e%60konomiki%20(AST,%202010)(ISBN%205983920103)(ru)(256s)%20GG%20.pdf [in Russian].
Schwab K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Kharkiv, KSD, 2019 [in Ukrainian].
Sidenko V. Challenges and risks of digital transformation: Global and Ukrainian contexts. Economy of Ukraine, 2021, No. 5, pp. 40-58. available at doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2021.05.040 [in Ukrainian].
doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2021.05.040
Heyets V. Endogenous Social Progress as a Source of Economic Growth. Ekonomista, 2021, Vol. 1, pp. 167-181, available at: www.pte.pl/pliki/1/8905/Ekonomista_21-1_167-181.pdf
doi.org/10.52335/dvqigjykfff6
Akhmedova M. For whom the bell of the new world order really tolls. Ekspert, 2021, No. 7, pp. 58-65 [in Russian].
O'Neil C. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Kyiv, BookChef, 2020 [in Ukrainian].
Grammatchikov A. Automotive data, whose will you be? Ekspert, 2021, No. 36 (1219), pp. 13-17, available at: www.insur-info.ru/press/168224/ [in Russian].
Mertz B. Red Land, Black Land: Daily Life in Ancient Egypt. Moscow, Tsentrpoligraf, 2004 [in Russian].
Banerjee A., Duflo E. Good Economics for Hard Times. Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Publisher of the Gaidar Institute, 2021 [in Russian].
Kolodko G. Economy of new pragmatism: Definition, purpose, methods. Economy of Ukraine, 2020, No. 2, pp. 3-23. available at doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2020.02.003 [in Ukrainian].
doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2020.02.003
Nellie Bowles: Human Contact is Now a Luxury Good. News analysis. The New York Times, Sunday Review, March 23, 2019, available at: www.nytimes.com/2019/03/23/sunday-review/human-contact-luxury-screens.html
Bourmaud D. Two Frances through the prism of social movements. Current Problems of Europe, 2021, No. 3, pp. 113-135, available at: upe-journal.ru/files/2021_АПЕ_3_Бурмо_Д.pdf [in Russian].
doi.org/10.31249/ape/2021.03.05
Akaev A., Sadovnichy V. The human component as a determining factor of labor productivity in the digital economy. Problems of Forecasting, 2021, No. 1, pp. 45-58, available at: ecfor.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/tehnologicheskij-progress-i-trud-v-tsifrovoj-ekonomike.pdf [in Russian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Economy of Ukraine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.